Term review
Spring term 2026
Spring term 2026: 20 decisions from 6 meetings. All time: 32 decisions.
Numbers
20 decisions made. 18 done on time. 0 still open.
Strategy by priority
Priority 1. The same work gets the same grade, whoever marks it, in MYP and DP.
1 of 2 on time
File the internally standardised exhibition example. · 4 days late
Standardise one TOK exhibition example together. · On time
Priority 2. Every student can say what good work looks like and what to do next.
No decision logged on this priority in this term.
Priority 3. Teachers get better together at one practice, with SLT learning alongside.
No decision logged on this priority in this term.
What went well
Every TOK draft was returned within ten school days.
EE check-ins kept their three-week rhythm all term.
Worth your attention
2 actions finished late. Booking CAS interviews finished 4 days late (due 20 Jan).
Repeated in notes without a decision: The exhibition examples are still not the same standard.
Anna carried 11 of the 20 decisions. Marco could take one action.
Summary
Spring term 2026: 20 decisions from 6 meetings. All time: 32 decisions. Every TOK draft was returned within ten school days. EE check-ins kept their three-week rhythm all term. 2 actions finished late.
Before the next term, look at the 2 actions that finished late, starting with booking CAS interviews. A note was repeated and never became a decision: The exhibition examples are still not the same standard.